We may legitimately say that nature -- in the multiplicity of its objects -- has been considered in his history of aesthetics, as a central ground of aesthetical experience, and also as object of theoretical investigation on the modalities of that experience. On the other hand, a process is at present observed in which, that theme has been slowly considered of secondary importance, mainly after Hegel's aesthetics -- or rather philosophy of art. In this paper we try to show how (...) nature is being rediscovered both as the subject and as the background of aesthetical experience of art itself, mainly in the work of one of the greatest authors in contemporary aesthetical thought -- Mikel Dufrenne. It is also claimed that that rediscovery renews the metaphysical dimension of the aesthetical discourse. (shrink)

Procuramos, com este trabalho, levantar algumas pistas que nos parecem fundamentais concernentes à natureza da significação estética das obras de arte, tentando mostrar como esta significação é em si mesma urn horizonte de sentido irredutível aos seus significados parciais. Para isso, delimitamos um itinerário cuja perspectiva de fundo se situa, sobretudo, no interior da estética fenomenológica trabalhada pelos textos de Mikel Dufrenne, e articulado em quatroblocos concêntricos: a indagação do fundamento de uma semântica de ordem estética; o confronto com o (...) objectivismo da semiologia estruturalista; o modo como o objecto estético se distingue dos objectos especificamente significantes; finalmente, de como essa diferenciação lhe perm ite prosseguir um poder desobressignificar. /// Nous cherchons dans ce travail à fournir quelques pistes qui nous paraissent fondamentales concernant la nature de la signification esthetique des oeuvres d'art en essayant de montrer que cette signification est en elle même un horizon de sens irréductible à ses signifiés partiels. Pource faire, nous délimitons un itinéraire dont laperspective de fond se situe surtout à l'intérieur de l'esthétique phénoménologique travaillée par les textes de Mikel Dufrenne; et dont l'articulation se fait en quatre blocs concentriques: la recherche du fondement d'une sémantique d'ordre esthétique; la confrontation avec l'objectivisme de la sémiologie structurasliste; la façon dont l'objet esthétique se distingue des objets spécifiquement signifiants; enfin, la maniére dont cette différanciation lui permet de poursuivre une capacité de sursignifier. /// In this paper we put forward some suggestions which we consider of fundamental importance as to the nature of the aesthetical significance of art works, and attempt to show that this significance is in itself an horizon of sense, irreducible to its partial meanings. To attain this goal, we outline an itinerary whose background outlook is in line with the phenomenological aesthetics put forward in Mikel Dufrenne's texts, an articulated in four concentric parts: investigation about the foundation of a semantics of an aesthetical kind; confrontation with the objectivism of the structuralist semeiology; the way an aesthetical object differs from the other specifically significant objects; finally, how this differentiation gives such an object the power to oversignify. (shrink)